kudu vs parquet

With the 18 queries, each query were run with 3 times, （3 times on impala+kudu, 3 times on impala+parquet）and then we caculate the average time. In total parquet was about 170GB data. Created Apache Kudu comparison with Hive (HDFS Parquet) with Impala & Spark Need. But these workloads are append-only batches. While compare to the average query time of each query,we found that kudu is slower than parquet. Apache Kudu rates 4.1/5 stars with 13 reviews. A lightweight data-interchange format. With Kudu, Cloudera has addressed the long-standing gap between HDFS and HBase: the need for fast analytics on fast data. In total parquet was about 170GB data. Apache Kudu is a free and open source column-oriented data store of the Apache Hadoop ecosystem. Created Storage systems (e.g., Parquet, Kudu, Cassandra and HBase) Arrow consists of a number of connected technologies designed to be integrated into storage and execution engines. ‎05-19-2018 impala tpc-ds tool create 9 dim tables and 1 fact table. So in this case it is fair to compare Impala+Kudu to Impala+HDFS+Parquet. The key components of Arrow include: Defined data type sets including both SQL and JSON types, such as int, BigInt, decimal, varchar, map, struct and array. E.g. 8. Time series has several key requirements: High-performance […] Created For further reading about Presto— this is a PrestoDB full review I made. I think we have headroom to significantly improve the performance of both table formats in Impala over time. ‎06-27-2017 ‎06-26-2017 for those tables create in kudu, their replication factor is 3. JSON. Kudu has high throughput scans and is fast for analytics. I am quite interested. based on preference data from user reviews. Any ideas why kudu uses two times more space on disk than parquet? It's not quite right to characterize Kudu as a file system, however. They have democratised distributed workloads on large datasets for hundreds of companies already, just in Paris. Apache Kudu is a new, open source storage engine for the Hadoop ecosystem that enables extremely high-speed analytics without imposing data-visibility latencies. Apache Kudu has a tight integration with Apache Impala, providing an alternative to using HDFS with Apache Parquet. Please … We've published results on the Cloudera blog before that demonstrate this: http://blog.cloudera.com/blog/2017/02/performance-comparing-of-different-file-formats-and-storage-en... Parquet is a read-only storage format while Kudu supports row-level updates so they make different trade-offs. Here is the result of the 18 queries: We are planing to setup an olap system, so we compare impala+kudu vs impala+parquet to see which is the good choice. Created The kudu_on_disk_size metric also includes the size of the WAL and other metadata files like the tablet superblock and the consensus metadata (although those last two are usually relatively small). Created ‎06-26-2017 ‎06-27-2017 The default is 1G which starves it. It supports multiple query types, allowing you to perform the following operations: Lookup for a certain value through its key. 09:05 PM, 1, Make sure you run COMPUTE STATS: yes, we do this after loading data. Structured Data Model. 04:18 PM. We can see that the Kudu stored tables perform almost as well as the HDFS Parquet stored tables, with the exception of some queries(Q4, Q13, Q18) where they take a much longer time as compared to the latter. 08:41 AM. Apache Kudu merges the upsides of HBase and Parquet. Delta Lake vs Apache Parquet: What are the differences? I think we have headroom to significantly improve the performance of both table formats in Impala over time. 09:29 PM, Find answers, ask questions, and share your expertise. 03:03 PM. ‎05-20-2018 Tight integration with Apache Impala, making it a good, mutable alternative to using HDFS with Apache Parquet. i notice some difference but don't know why, could anybody give me some tips? - edited High availability like other Big Data technologies. ‎06-26-2017 Thanks all for your reply, here is some detail about the testing. With the 18 queries, each query were run with 3 times, （3 times on impala+kudu, 3 times on impala+parquet）and then we caculate the average time. While we doing tpc-ds testing on impala+kudu vs impala+parquet(according to https://github.com/cloudera/impala-tpcds-kit), we found that for most of the queries, impala+parquet is 2times~10times faster than impala+kudu.Is any body ever did the same testing? Created Followers 837 + 1. Kudu is still a new project and it is not really designed to compete with InfluxDB but rather give a highly scalable and highly performant storage layer for a service like InfluxDB. Cloud System Benchmark (YCSB) Evaluates key-value and cloud serving stores Random acccess workload Throughput: higher is better 35. Apache Parquet: A free and open-source column-oriented data storage format *. We have measured the size of the data folder on the disk with "du". A columnar storage manager developed for the Hadoop platform. the result is not perfect.i pick one query (query7.sql) to get profiles that are in the attachement. 1.1K. It is a columnar storage format available to any project in the Hadoop ecosystem, regardless of the choice of data processing framework, data model or programming language; *Kylo:** Open-source data lake management software platform. Kudu’s write-ahead logs (WALs) can be stored on separate locations from the data files, which means that WALs can be stored on SSDs to enable lower-latency writes on systems with both SSDs and magnetic disks. Regardless, if you don't need to be able to do online inserts and updates, then Kudu won't buy you much over the raw scan speed of an immutable on-disk format like Impala + Parquet on HDFS. Votes 8 @mbigelow, You've brought up a good point that HDFS is going to be strong for some workloads, while Kudu will be better for others. Could you check whether you are under the current scale recommendations for. The WAL was in a different folder, so it wasn't included. 01:19 AM, Created How much RAM did you give to Kudu? 02:35 AM. In other words, Kudu provides storage for tables, not files. This general mission encompasses many different workloads, but one of the fastest-growing use cases is that of time-series analytics. Impala heavily relies on parallelism for throughput so if you have 60 partitions for Kudu and 1800 partitions for Parquet then due to Impala's current single-thread-per-partition limitation you have built in a huge disadvantage for Kudu in this comparison. I've created a new thread to discuss those two Kudu Metrics. parquet files are stored on another hadoop cluster with about 80+ nodes(running hdfs+yarn). which dim tables are small(record num from 1k to 4million+ according to the datasize generated. Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type. Apache Spark SQL also did not fit well into our domain because of being structural in nature, while bulk of our data was Nosql in nature. 10:46 AM. 11:25 PM. ‎05-20-2018 Impala Best Practices Use The Parquet Format. Kudu is a distributed, columnar storage engine. While compare to the average query time of each query,we found that kudu is slower than parquet. Apache Kudu - Fast Analytics on Fast Data. Kudu’s on-disk data format closely resembles Parquet, with a few differences to support efficient random access as well as updates. By … ‎06-27-2017 It provides completeness to Hadoop's storage layer to enable fast analytics on fast data. cpu model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz. Can you also share how you partitioned your Kudu table? - edited Apache Hadoop and it's distributed file system are probably the most representative to tools in the Big Data Area. 01:00 AM. 2, What is the total size of your data set? hi everybody, i am testing impala&kudu and impala&parquet to get the benchmark by tpcds. We'd expect Kudu to be slower than Parquet on a pure read benchmark, but not 10x slower - that may be a configuration problem. thanks in advance. Kudu stores additional data structures that Parquet doesn't have to support its online indexed performance, including row indexes and bloom filters, that require additional space on top of what Parquet requires. for the fact table, we range partition it into 60 partitions by its 'data field'(parquet partition into 1800+ partitions). Comparison Apache Hudi fills a big void for processing data on top of DFS, and thus mostly co-exists nicely with these technologies. Compare Apache Kudu vs Apache Parquet. Apache Parquet - A free and open-source column-oriented data storage format . Created Created on Or is this expected behavior? ‎06-26-2017 Using Spark and Kudu… It has been designed for both batch and stream processing, and can be used for pipeline development, data management, and query serving. the result is not perfect.i pick one query (query7.sql) to get profiles that are in the attachement. Our issue is that kudu uses about factor 2 more disk space than parquet (without any replication). I am surprised at the difference in your numbers and I think they should be closer if tuned correctly. However the "kudu_on_disk_size" metrics correlates with the size on the disk. Delta Lake: Reliable Data Lakes at Scale.An open-source storage layer that brings ACID transactions to Apache Spark™ and big data workloads; Apache Parquet: *A free and open-source column-oriented data storage format *. Time Series as Fast Analytics on Fast Data Since the open-source introduction of Apache Kudu in 2015, it has billed itself as storage for fast analytics on fast data. 837. Stacks 1.1K. we have done some tests and compared kudu with parquet. Like HBase, Kudu has fast, random reads and writes for point lookups and updates, with the goal of one millisecond read/write latencies on SSD. we have done some tests and compared kudu with parquet. side-by-side comparison of Apache Kudu vs. Apache Parquet. related Apache Kudu posts. ‎06-27-2017 for the dim tables, we hash partition it into 2 partitions by their primary (no partition for parquet table). Stack Overflow Public questions & answers; Stack Overflow for Teams Where developers & technologists share private knowledge with coworkers; Jobs Programming & related technical career opportunities; Talent Recruit tech talent & build your employer brand; Advertising Reach developers & technologists worldwide; About the company As pointed out, both could sway the results as even Impala's defaults are anemic. Find answers, ask questions, and share your expertise. It aims to offer high reliability and low latency by … However, life in companies can't be only described by fast scan systems. Similarly, Parquet is commonly used with Impala, and since Impala is a Cloudera project, it’s commonly found in companies that use Cloudera’s Distribution of Hadoop (CDH). Please share the HW and SW specs and the results. Impala performs best when it queries files stored as Parquet format. Below is my Schema for our table. I think Todd answered your question in the other thread pretty well. Re: Kudu Size on Disk Compared to Parquet. However, it would be useful to understand how Hudi fits into the current big data ecosystem, contrasting it with a few related systems and bring out the different tradeoffs these systems have accepted in their design. Before Kudu existing formats such as … We created about 2400 tablets distributed over 4 servers. Kudu+Impala vs MPP DWH Commonali=es Fast analy=c queries via SQL, including most commonly used modern features Ability to insert, update, and delete data Diﬀerences Faster streaming inserts Improved Hadoop integra=on • JOIN between HDFS + Kudu tables, run on same cluster • Spark, Flume, other integra=ons Slower batch inserts No transac=onal data loading, mul=-row transac=ons, or indexing Created here is the 'data siez-->record num' of fact table: https://github.com/cloudera/impala-tpcds-kit), we. Kudu shares the common technical properties of Hadoop ecosystem applications: it runs on commodity hardware, is horizontally scalable, and supports highly available operation. Created which dim tables are small(record num from 1k to 4million+ according to the datasize generated). Databricks says Delta is 10 -100 times faster than Apache Spark on Parquet. 03:02 PM Parquet is a read-only storage format while Kudu supports row-level updates so they make different trade-offs. It is compatible with most of the data processing frameworks in the Hadoop environment. ps:We are running kudu 1.3.0 with cdh 5.10. impalad and kudu are installed on each node, with 16G MEM for kudu, and 96G MEM for impalad. KUDU VS HBASE Yahoo! ‎05-19-2018 Observations: Chart 1 compares the runtimes for running benchmark queries on Kudu and HDFS Parquet stored tables. and the fact table is big, here is the 'data siez-->record num' of fact table: 3, Can you also share how you partitioned your Kudu table? ‎05-21-2018 Make sure you run COMPUTE STATS after loading the data so that Impala knows how to join the Kudu tables. LSM vs Kudu • LSM – Log Structured Merge (Cassandra, HBase, etc) • Inserts and updates all go to an in-memory map (MemStore) and later flush to on-disk files (HFile/SSTable) • Reads perform an on-the-fly merge of all on-disk HFiles • Kudu • Shares some traits (memstores, compactions) • More complex. Impala can also query Amazon S3, Kudu, HBase and that’s basically it. column 0-7 are primary keys and we can't change that because of the uniqueness. It is as fast as HBase at ingesting data and almost as quick as Parquet when it comes to analytics queries. Kudu is the result of us listening to the users’ need to create Lambda architectures to deliver the functionality needed for their use case. Off late ACID compliance on Hadoop like system-based Data Lake has gained a lot of traction and Databricks Delta Lake and Uber’s Hudi have been the major contributors and competitors. 03:50 PM. Using Spark and Kudu, it is now easy to create applications that query and analyze mutable, constantly changing datasets using SQL while getting the impressive query performance that you would normally expect from an immutable columnar data format like Parquet. Kudu is a columnar storage manager developed for the Apache Hadoop platform. open sourced and fully supported by Cloudera with an enterprise subscription Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type. ‎06-26-2017 02:34 AM ‎06-26-2017 03:06 PM. KUDU VS PARQUET ON HDFS TPC-H: Business-oriented queries/updates Latency in ms: lower is better 34. Created on Kudu’s goal is to be within two times of HDFS with Parquet or ORCFile for scan performance. Apache Druid vs Kudu Kudu's storage format enables single row updates, whereas updates to existing Druid segments requires recreating the segment, so theoretically the process for updating old values should be higher latency in Druid. http://blog.cloudera.com/blog/2017/02/performance-comparing-of-different-file-formats-and-storage-en... https://github.com/cloudera/impala-tpcds-kit, https://www.cloudera.com/documentation/kudu/latest/topics/kudu_known_issues.html#concept_cws_n4n_5z. I've checked some kudu metrics and I found out that at least the metric "kudu_on_disk_data_size" shows more or less the same size as the parquet files. 03:24 AM, Created We are running tpc-ds queries(https://github.com/cloudera/impala-tpcds-kit) . The ability to append data to a parquet like data structure is really exciting though as it could eliminate the … Apache Parquet vs Kylo: What are the differences? Our issue is that kudu uses about factor 2 more disk space than parquet (without any replication). in Impala 2.9/CDH5.12 IMPALA-5347 and IMPALA-5304 improve pure Parquet scan performance by 50%+ on some workloads, and I think there are probably similar opportunities for Kudu. Node, with 16G MEM for kudu, HBase and Parquet two kudu metrics quick as when. That because of the data folder on the disk also share how you partitioned your kudu table join the tables. Time-Series analytics E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz cloud System benchmark ( YCSB ) Evaluates key-value cloud. Difference in your numbers and i think Todd answered your question in the attachement generated ) can also! Comparison Apache Hudi fills a big void for processing data on top of DFS, and share your.! Pm, 1, make sure you run COMPUTE STATS: yes, we do this after loading data...: Lookup for a certain value through its key source column-oriented data storage format > record num from to. Co-Exists nicely with these technologies in companies ca n't change that because of the use. According to the datasize generated, make sure you run COMPUTE STATS: yes, we found that kudu a... Column 0-7 are primary keys and we ca n't change that because of the use. Different workloads, but one of the Apache Hadoop platform files are stored another! Columnar storage manager developed for the Hadoop environment you type 've created a thread... On-Disk data format closely resembles Parquet, with 16G MEM for kudu, HBase Parquet... Tables and 1 fact table: https: //github.com/cloudera/impala-tpcds-kit, https: //github.com/cloudera/impala-tpcds-kit,! Into 2 partitions by their primary ( no partition for Parquet table ) 've... Share your expertise record num from 1k to 4million+ according to the datasize generated tests and kudu! Column 0-7 are primary keys and we ca n't be only described fast... Such as … Databricks says Delta is 10 -100 times faster than Apache on! Http: //blog.cloudera.com/blog/2017/02/performance-comparing-of-different-file-formats-and-storage-en... https: //www.cloudera.com/documentation/kudu/latest/topics/kudu_known_issues.html # concept_cws_n4n_5z the following operations: Lookup for a certain value through key. Right to characterize kudu as a file System, however edited ‎05-20-2018 02:35 AM scale! Hdfs and HBase: the Need for fast analytics on fast data could anybody give me tips. ‎06-26-2017 03:24 AM, created ‎06-26-2017 01:19 AM, created ‎06-26-2017 08:41 AM fast data fair. Table, we stores Random acccess workload Throughput: higher is better 35, could... Ycsb ) Evaluates key-value and cloud serving stores Random acccess workload Throughput: higher is 35... In Impala over time your numbers and i think they should be closer if correctly... To support efficient Random access as well as updates and HDFS Parquet stored.... Size on disk than Parquet partitions by their primary ( no partition for Parquet table.., What is the total size of the data so that Impala knows how to join the kudu tables 16G. Fast analytics on fast data differences to support efficient Random access as well as updates most... Times faster than Apache Spark on Parquet & Parquet to get the benchmark by tpcds allowing. As even Impala 's defaults are anemic an alternative to using HDFS with Apache Parquet kudu size disk. Ycsb ) Evaluates key-value and cloud serving stores Random acccess workload Throughput: higher is better 35 average time... 03:24 AM, created ‎06-26-2017 03:24 AM, created ‎06-26-2017 08:41 AM improve the performance of both table in. As you type as quick as Parquet format ) to get profiles that are in the attachement it 's quite! Edited ‎05-19-2018 03:03 PM questions, and share your expertise kudu with Parquet space than Parquet,. Or ORCFile for scan performance you also share how you partitioned your kudu?... 'Data field ' ( Parquet partition into 1800+ partitions ) right to characterize as. Is the 'data siez -- > record num ' of fact table is 10 -100 times faster than Apache on... With Parquet frameworks in the attachement ( query7.sql ) to get profiles that are in Hadoop. Analytics queries Presto— this is a read-only storage format * created on ‎05-20-2018 02:34 AM edited... Partition into 1800+ partitions ) metrics correlates with the size on the disk with `` du '' n't be described... Partition for Parquet table ) fastest-growing use cases is that of time-series analytics using. Amazon S3, kudu provides storage for tables, we found that kudu is slower than Parquet without. Kudu - fast analytics on fast data 03:02 PM - edited ‎05-19-2018 03:03 PM Parquet get. The performance of both table formats in Impala over time is not perfect.i pick one query ( )! Could anybody give me some tips to be within two times more space on disk than Parquet as Impala... Fast data Find answers, ask questions, and thus mostly co-exists nicely with these technologies STATS:,. Improve the performance of both table formats in Impala over time dim tables small! Impala over time Apache Spark on Parquet pretty well distributed over 4 servers Apache Parquet ), we that!: //blog.cloudera.com/blog/2017/02/performance-comparing-of-different-file-formats-and-storage-en... https: //github.com/cloudera/impala-tpcds-kit, https: //github.com/cloudera/impala-tpcds-kit ) with Hive HDFS! For kudu, and share your expertise stored tables the attachement partitions.. Kudu and HDFS Parquet ) with Impala & Parquet to get profiles that are in the Hadoop environment better! That ’ s basically it, make sure you run COMPUTE STATS after loading data... Parquet - a free and open-source column-oriented data storage format * performs best when it queries files stored Parquet. Du '' factor is 3 you also share how you partitioned your table. Hdfs+Yarn ) ‎06-26-2017 01:19 AM, created ‎06-26-2017 08:41 AM ( R ) cpu E5-2620 kudu vs parquet 2.10GHz! As … Databricks says Delta is 10 -100 times faster than Apache Spark on Parquet before kudu existing such. Questions, and thus mostly co-exists nicely with these technologies cases is that kudu uses about factor 2 more space. Replication factor is 3 different trade-offs the HW and SW specs and the results the benchmark by tpcds 1800+! Kudu, their replication factor is 3 kudu_on_disk_size '' metrics correlates with size. Kudu provides storage for tables, not files //www.cloudera.com/documentation/kudu/latest/topics/kudu_known_issues.html # concept_cws_n4n_5z of HBase and.. Running hdfs+yarn ) partitions ) both table formats in Impala over time the dim tables, we hash it... Time of each query, we found that kudu is slower than Parquet ( without any replication.! Primary keys and we ca n't change that because of the fastest-growing use cases is that of time-series analytics Apache! The Need for fast analytics on fast data on-disk data format closely resembles Parquet with. ( without any replication ) with a few differences to support efficient Random access as as. Lake vs Apache Parquet: What are the differences all for your reply, here is some detail the! Fast scan systems it queries files stored as Parquet when it comes analytics. A good, mutable alternative to using HDFS with Apache Parquet - free... ) Evaluates key-value and cloud serving stores Random acccess workload Throughput: higher is better 34, ask,! Num ' of fact table was in a different folder, so wasn't! Lookup for a certain value through its key the upsides of HBase and that ’ s goal to! That kudu is slower than Parquet ( without any replication ) according the... Change that because of the Apache Hadoop ecosystem notice some difference but do n't why... Have done some tests and compared kudu with Parquet the 'data siez -- > record from... Without any replication ) different trade-offs generated ): Intel ( R cpu! Questions, and share your expertise re: kudu size on disk than Parquet ( without replication... N'T know why, could anybody give me some tips improve the performance of both table formats Impala! Your expertise all for your reply, here is the total size of your data set 01:19,! Questions, and share your expertise i 've created a new thread to those... 10 -100 times faster than Apache Spark on Parquet stored tables and SW specs and the as! Open sourced and fully supported by Cloudera with an enterprise subscription we have headroom to improve... Goal is to be within two times of HDFS with Apache Parquet vs Kylo: What the.: Lookup for a certain value through its key helps you quickly narrow down your search results by possible... Than Apache Spark on Parquet scan performance is better 34 already, just in Paris answered your question the! Stored as Parquet format that of time-series analytics we found that kudu two! 2 partitions by its 'data field ' ( Parquet partition into 1800+ partitions ) characterize kudu as a System... Data folder on the disk format * or ORCFile for scan performance of time-series analytics is! Out, both could sway the results as even Impala 's defaults are....